7 Core Personality Factors: Definitions and Examples
Personality has long captivated the field of psychology, serving as one of its most fascinating and widely applied areas. The roots of experimental psychology and the study of human personality trace back to the late 19th century, when German physiologist and philosopher Wilhelm Wundt laid the groundwork for this burgeoning field1. The seven core personality factors; Agreeableness, Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Honesty/Humility, Industriousness, Methodicalness, and Openness to Experience; are measured by the Jackson Personality Inventory™-3 (JPI™-3). This model builds on the Five-Factor Model (FFM) that American psychologists Paul Costa and Robert McCrae developed to describe Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (low Emotional Stability), often summarized as “OCEAN.”2
It also builds on the HEXACO model, which Canadian psychologists Kibeom Lee and Michael C. Ashton introduced by adding Honesty/Humility as a sixth factor.3 The JPI-3 refines this further by dividing Conscientiousness into two distinct dimensions: Industriousness and Methodicalness, because conscientiousness has been described as “the most potent, non-cognitive predictor of workplace performance.”4 This is a general-personality, workplace-relevant model; it is a different framework from the seven pathological personality traits used in some clinical diagnostic models. In this blog, SIGMA’s experts delve into the definitions, benefits, and key considerations for each of these seven core personality factors.
7 Core Personality Factors
These seven core personality factors form the foundation of personality assessment and understanding individual differences:
- Agreeableness
- Emotional Stability
- Extraversion
- Honesty/Humility
- Industriousness
- Methodicalness
- Openness to Experience
What is Personality?
Though personality is an abstract concept, it can be defined in a few fundamental ways. At its core, personality is composed of the unique characteristics that distinguish individuals from one another. These traits — distinctive patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors — help us recognize similarities and differences among people. Personality traits themselves are non-physical, though they often manifest in physical expressions, such as choices in clothing or hairstyle.
Personality is shaped by a combination of biological factors and environmental influences, and generally remains consistent throughout adult life. However, certain traits can be developed to modest degrees through life events, or behavioral interventions and coaching. This potential for growth is crucial when assessing talent and identifying opportunities for personal and professional development.
1. Agreeableness
What is Agreeableness?
Agreeableness refers to the tendency to get along easily with others and be willing to help those in need. People who score high on Agreeableness are forgiving, non-judgmental, and trusting in nature. As one of the most important workplace personality traits, Agreeableness influences how employees collaborate, resolve conflict, build trust, and contribute to team performance.
6 Traits of Agreeable People:
Cooperative, empathetic, forgiving, non-judgmental, nurturing, trusting.
Benefits of Strong Agreeableness:
- High scores on Agreeableness are positively related to group performance.5
- High scores on Agreeableness are negatively related to abusive supervision.6
- Agreeableness is positively related to supportive leadership7 and the charismatic dimension of transformational leadership.8
- Agreeableness has been shown to predict the growth of interpersonal relationships.9
Cautions for High Scores on Agreeableness:
- May prefer to avoid conflict rather than manage or proactively mitigate it.
- May try to please others and avoid offering alternative opinions or ideas, even if they are viable or better options.
- May be overly trusting of other people, allowing them to be taken advantage of.
Cautions for Low Scores on Agreeableness:
- May be prone towards instigating or exacerbating conflict.
- May adopt a contentious perspective for unproductive purposes.
- May disrupt group cohesion, teambuilding, and unity.
2. Emotional Stability
What is Emotional Stability?
Emotional Stability refers to the tendency to remain calm and composed when faced with uncertain or stressful situations. People who score high on Emotional Stability are confident and capable of regulating their moods. In workplace settings, Emotional Stability influences how individuals respond to stress, uncertainty, organizational change, and interpersonal conflict.
6 Traits of Emotionally Stable People:
Accepting of criticism, carefree, even-tempered, capable of handling stress, optimistic, strong self-esteem.
Benefits of Strong Emotional Stability:
- High scores on Emotional Stability have been linked to greater career resilience.10
- The ability to regulate emotions is associated with better mental health outcomes.11
- Emotional Stability is related to better job satisfaction and performance.12
Cautions for High Scores on Emotional Stability:
- May not be able to share in strong emotions to the same extent as others on their team.
- May struggle to understand or be patient with those who are more sensitive to negative emotions
- May not take emotional factors into account when communicating or making decisions.
Cautions for Low Scores on Emotional Stability:
- May not effectively handle pressure, uncertainty, or stressful situations.
- May struggle with receiving constructive criticism and managing conflict.
- May let emotions impede job productivity and satisfaction.
3. Extraversion
What is Extraversion?
Extraversion refers to the tendency to enjoy, feel comfortable, and demonstrate confidence in group settings, including persuading others and assuming leadership roles. Extraverted people are able to modify their actions and words to suit different situations. In organizational psychology, Extraversion is consistently associated with leadership emergence, effective communication, networking, and influence. While highly extraverted individuals often thrive in collaborative environments, both introverted and extraverted employees can achieve exceptional performance.
6 Traits of Extraverted People:
Desiring affiliation (belonging), desiring to lead, enjoying attention, persuasive, socially adaptable, socially confident.
Benefits of Strong Extraversion:
- Out of all personality traits, Extraversion is the best and most consistent predictor of important leadership outcomes;13 Extraversion has also been found to be positively related to transformational leadership14,15,16,17,18 and charismatic leadership.19
- Extraversion is associated with greater life satisfaction and positive relationships.20
- On average, extraverted individuals score higher on motivation and performance.21
Cautions for High Scores on Extraversion:
- May struggle to stay motivated and focused when working independently.
- May have a tendency of dominating conversations and struggle with active listening.
- May have a hard time working remotely if living on their own.
Cautions for Low Scores on Extraversion:
- May avoid meetings and teamwork even when they would be beneficial.
- May take longer to adapt to new teams.
- May be less inclined towards management, liaison, or other roles that require more assertiveness or leadership skills.
4. Honesty/Humility
What is Honesty/Humility?
Honesty/Humility refers to the tendency to be truthful, humble, and straightforward with others. People who score high on Honesty/Humility avoid taking risks and carefully follow established rules. This trait plays an important role in building trust, promoting ethical leadership, and fostering a culture of accountability and transparency throughout an organization.
6 Traits of Honest/Humble People:
Modest, risk averse, rule compliant, sincere, truthful, unentitled.
Benefits of Strong Honesty/Humility:
- Studies have shown that leaders’ Honesty/Humility is negatively related to abusive supervision22 and positively related to ethical23 and authentic leadership.24
- Honesty/Humility is positively correlated with supervisor ratings of overall job performance;25 in fact, in measures of individual and contextual performance, humility has been shown to compensate for lower cognitive ability.26
- Leaders’ expressed humility is positively related with follower engagement.27
Cautions for High Scores on Honesty/Humility:
- May be less adept at communicating strategically and knowing when it is wise to omit information.
- May overlook opportunities due to a strong aversion to risk.
- May struggle to be innovative and creative if they strictly adhere to established procedures.
Cautions for Low Scores on Honesty/Humility:
- May be more prone towards risk-taking and bending the rules.
- May be inclined toward twisting or obscuring difficult news or undesired outcomes.
- May disrupt group cohesion by acting entitled and arrogant.
5. Industriousness
What is Industriousness?
Industriousness refers to the tendency to strive tirelessly for excellence. This personality trait is closely associated with employee engagement, productivity, achievement orientation, and long-term career success. People who score high on Industriousness work hard, set challenging goals, and derive meaning from work.
6 Traits of Industrious People:
Achievement-oriented, competitive, high/sustained energy, engaged, hard-working, persistent.
Benefits of Strong Industriousness:
- Employees who are engaged in their work tend to do better on overall scores of productivity, well-being, and organizational citizenship.28
- Organizations are more profitable and productive when their employees are engaged.29
- Employee competitiveness is positively related to innovation and career satisfaction.30
Cautions for High Scores on Industriousness:
- May wear out, stress, or frustrate individuals who cannot match their high and sustained energy.
- May disrupt teamwork with their strong competitive spirit.
- May prioritize achievement over maintaining relationships or work/life balance.
Cautions for Low Scores on Industriousness:
- May struggle to stay motivated or to motivate others.
- May be more prone to giving up when a project or relationship becomes difficult.
- May be less inclined to strive for excellence in their work.
6. Methodicalness
What is Methodicalness?
Methodicalness refers to the tendency to act in a deliberate and planful manner. This workplace personality trait is particularly valuable in roles requiring accuracy, reliability, compliance, project management, and quality assurance. People who score high on Methodicalness can be counted on to meet commitments and deadlines.
6 Traits of Methodical People:
Strong impulse control, organized, planner, punctual, reliable, self-disciplined.
Benefits of Strong Methodicalness:
- Employees with good time management skills are more engaged, proactive, and productive in their roles.31
- There is a positive association between time management skills and reduced stress levels among employees.32
- Self-control is related to higher salary and occupational prestige.33
Cautions for High Scores on Methodicalness:
- May focus excessively on planning and neglect to implement plans.
- May struggle to make quick decisions or take part in activities spontaneously.
- May have difficulty being flexible and adapting project goals and timelines.
Cautions for Low Scores on Methodicalness:
- May have difficulty adhering to standardized processes.
- May deprioritize punctuality and reliability.
- May struggle to spot subtle mistakes or deliver a high-quality product when the work requires attention to detail.
7. Openness to Experience
What is Openness to Experience?
Openness to Experience refers to the tendency to enjoy creative pursuits and original thinking. This personality trait is associated with creativity, innovation, strategic thinking, and continuous learning. People who score high on Openness to Experience thrive when there is an opportunity to learn, discuss differences of opinion, or try something new.
6 Traits of People Who Are Open to Experience:
Abstract thinking, appreciation of aesthetics, breadth of interest, embraces change, embraces differences, innovative.
Benefits of Strong Openness to Experience:
- Openness to Experience is positively related to subjective well-being.34
- Being open minded has a positive, significant effect on group learning capacity.35
- Trying something new has been found to increase the brain’s ability to adapt and solve problems.36
Cautions for High Scores on Openness to Experience:
- May be inclined towards change and innovation when maintaining the status quo is the better option.
- May require a variety of tasks to satisfy their intellectual curiosity.
- May prolong the completion of routine, practical tasks because of a preference for those involving thinking or creativity.
Cautions for Low Scores on Openness to Experience:
- May prefer to follow established procedures rather than trying novel methods that might be more effective.
- May struggle to appreciate different personalities, experiences, and approaches to work.
- May have difficulty grasping “the big picture,” including abstract concepts such as long-term strategy or mission/vision statements.
How are the 7 Core Personality Factors Measured?
Are you ready to measure the seven core personality factors outlined above? The JPI-3 provides a convenient and scientifically validated solution. Administered online through SIGMA’s state-of-the-art platform, this assessment takes only 20 minutes to complete, making it an ideal tool for your research and talent development initiatives. These same personality dimensions also inform how organizations evaluate leadership potential. Traits such as Extraversion, Emotional Stability, and Honesty/Humility are consistently linked to leadership outcomes in the research cited throughout this article, which is why personality data is often used alongside dedicated leadership assessments when organizations are identifying and developing leadership talent.
Complete the form below to share your objectives and let us help you unlock the full potential of your team. We look forward to hearing from you.
Apply for a Research Discount
Discounts are available for researchers interested in using SIGMA’s assessments in their studies. If you are interested in using the JPI-3 for research, apply for a research discount today.
Get Started with SIGMA’s Assessments
Are you interested in using our assessments? Follow the steps below to submit an order.
Step 1: Complete the Test User Qualifications Form
Step 2: Download the Assessment Order Form
Step 3: Submit Your Assessment Order Form
If you have any questions about our assessments or the application process, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Our team would be happy to speak with you.
Speak With an Expert
Would you like to learn more about SIGMA’s personality assessments? Submit the form below and our team will be in touch with you shortly.
1 Rieber, R. W. (Robert W. ). (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and the making of a scientific psychology. Plenum Press.
2 Costa, P. & McCrae, R. R. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, 2, 51-87.
3 Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907.
4 Campbell, D. (2019, November 4). Being conscientious is one of the strongest predictors of success in the workplace, U of T study finds. University of Toronto. https://www.utoronto.ca/news/being-conscientious-one-strongest-predictors-success-workplace-u-t-study-finds.
5 Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 147-197). Consulting Psychologists Press.
6 Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2017). Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 691-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001.
7 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
8 Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5),751-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751.
9 Yang, D., & Tu, C. (2020). Influence of college students’ agreeableness on interpersonal relationships: Moderating role of empathy. Education and Urban Society, 53(4), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520928609.
10 Arora, R., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). Relationships between emotional stability, psychosocial mentoring support and career resilience. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i1.835.
11 Kraiss, J. T., ten Klooster, P. M., Moskowitz, J. T., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2020). The relationship between emotion regulation and well-being in patients with mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 102, Article 152189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152189.
12 Judge, T.A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.
13 Zhang, J., Yin, K., & Li, S. (2022). Leader extraversion and team performance: A moderated mediation model. PLoS One, 17 (12), Article e027876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278769
14 Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x.
15 Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-Factor Model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751.
16 Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the Five-Factor Model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610-621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.610.
17 Phipps, S. T., & Prieto, L. C. (2011). The influence of personality factors on transformational leadership: Exploring the moderating role of political skill. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(3), 430-447.
18 Rubin, R. S., Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behaviour. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 845-858. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803926.
19 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
20 Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000415.
21 Ibid.
22 Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2017). Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001.
23 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
24 Malik, M. F., Burhan, Q., & Khan, M. A. (2023). The role of HEXACO in the development of authentic leadership and its consequences on task performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2022-0356.
25 Shen, M., Rowatt, W. & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty-Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 857-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011.
26 Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for
performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
27 Ibid.
28 Gallup. (2024). The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes: Q12® Meta-Analysis [11th Ed.]. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx
29 Ibid.
30 Songke, X., Meng, X., Chaoping, L., & Dege, L. (2023). Can trait competitiveness foster positive outcomes? The role of perceived insider status and leader competitiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, Article 111968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111968.
31 Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710726136.
32 Bond M. J., & Feather, N.T. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.321.
33 Converse, P., Pathak, J., DePaul-Haddock, A., Gotlib, T., & Merbedone, M. (2012). Controlling your environment and yourself: Implications for career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.003.
34 Tucaković, L., & Nedeljković, B. (2023). Personality and affective correlates of openness to experience from Big Five and HEXACO personality models: The dual nature of Big Five openness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(4), 544-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2117047.
35 Lord, M. (2015). Group learning capacity: The roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150.
36 Park, A. J., Harris, A. Z., Martyniuk, K. M., Chang, C.-Y., Abbas, A. I., Lowes, D. C., Kellendonk, C., Gogos, J. A., & Gordon, J. A. (2021). Reset of hippocampal-prefrontal circuitry facilitates learning. Nature, 591(7851), 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03272-1.
