The Leadership Challenge vs. the LSP-R®: Better Tools for Building a Leadership Pipeline

Organizations evaluating leadership development options have many assessment tools and frameworks to consider. Two well-established options are:

Both solutions are grounded in decades of research and include a suite of supporting tools and services. This comparison reviews the frameworks, assessment methodology, scope and use cases, as well as strengths and limitations of each, helping HR professionals and people leaders determine the right fit for their organization.

Two Assessments, Two Frameworks

The Leadership Challenge is best known for its behavioral leadership framework and corresponding assessment tool, the LPI. Based on more than 40 years of research by leadership professors James Kouzes and Barry Posner, the LPI measures Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership:

  1. Model the Way
  2. Inspire a Shared Vision
  3. Challenge the Process
  4. Enable Others to Act
  5. Encourage the Heart

SIGMA’s Leadership Competency Framework

SIGMA’s Leadership Competency Framework covers 50 key leadership skills and abilities, measured by the LSP-R. Drawing on more than 50 years of research pioneered by Dr. Douglas N. Jackson, the LSP-R measures competencies organized into four major categories:

Leadership Competencies

Figure 1. SIGMA’s Leadership Competency Framework

Comparing Assessments: LPI vs. LSP-R

Both the LPI and LSP-R can be administered online in 20 to 25 minutes. Each assessment is available in self-report and 360-degree formats. The LPI also offers versions for students and a self-guided development option (LPI Self Empowered™). The LSP-R is a single assessment with two role-specific reports. It provides detailed scoring and guided development through the LSP-R Focus Report, and it supports hiring and promotion decisions through the LSP-R Selection Report. Because the LSP-R measures personality-based potential rather than current behavior, the same assessment works in both professional and educational contexts — no separate student version is required. In short, the LSP-R family covers more ground with fewer assessments, meaning organizations have access to more data with fewer tests to purchase and maintain. All available versions for both assessments are summarized in the table below.

Table comparing The Leadership Challenge's assessments with SIGMA's leadership competency assessments.

Figure 2. LPI® and LSP-R® assessment versions.

Comparing the LPI Self-Report with the LSP-R Focus Report

Both the LPI and LSP-R generate reports automatically upon completion. Key features of each report include:

Table comparing features of the LPI Self Report and the LSP-R Focus Report.

Figure 3. Features of the LPI® Self Report and the LSP-R® Focus Report.

The LPI Self Report includes personalized interpretation, templates, and activities to guide reflection and goal setting. However, this version omits detailed scores for each of the 30 leadership behaviors and percentile rankings by category. The LSP-R Focus Report, an output of the LSP-R assessment, includes both the customized feedback provided by the LPI Self Report and the detailed results provided by the LPI Self assessment.

Another advantage of the LSP-R is its emphasis on development prioritization. It pinpoints the most impactful competencies and supplies templates to build a personalized plan, track progress, and adjust as needed. The LPI Self Empowered includes many small reflection and goal-setting activities, but it does not provide a single, cohesive leadership development plan for test-takers.

About Benchmarking

A differentiating feature of the LSP-R is benchmarking — tailoring the report to a subset of competencies most relevant to a role, team, or organization. Benchmarking allows teams to create their own success profile for what leadership looks like in their specific context.

Benefits of benchmarking the LSP-R include:

  • Defining what leadership looks like for specific organizations, departments, or teams
  • Reducing the length of the LSP-R reports to improve usability
  • Focusing leadership development efforts on the competencies that matter most
  • Optimizing impact and improving return on investment (ROI) for leadership development programs

To learn more about benchmarking, read Benchmarking and the LSP-R®

Workshops and Certifications: LPI vs. LSP-R

Both the LPI and the LSP-R are supported by workshops designed to help organizations facilitate meaningful leadership development experiences, and support test-takers in making the most out of their results.

  • LPI workshops include short debriefs designed to help individuals interpret and apply their assessment results, as well as full-day sessions (The Leadership Challenge® and The Challenge Continues™), which help teams improve leadership effectiveness, increase engagement and performance, and retain talent. The Leadership Challenge also provides LPI Coaching Training and Practitioner, Facilitator, and Master certifications.
  • LSP-R offerings include assessment debriefs to support the interpretation and application of results. Coaching Training is available to build internal coaching capacity and equip leaders with the tools and skills needed to coach direct reports, as well as customized one-on-one leadership coaching. In addition, Leadership Development Workshops can be delivered for each competency measured by the LSP-R. These 60-minute virtual sessions provide evidence-based strategies, practical tools, and a tight focus on real organizational outcomes. Workshops can be packaged as a lunch-and-learn series or assembled into a tailored development program.

Comparing Scope and Use Cases: LPI vs. LSP-R

The LPI and LSP-R can both be used to measure leadership and provide meaningful leadership development experiences. Both assessments can be used in educational and professional contexts, by individuals as well as teams. The key difference between the LPI and LSP-R is that the LPI measures behavior while the LSP-R measures leadership potential. This means that the LSP-R can be used not just to measure and develop performance, but also to identify top talent, invest in high-potential employees, and make data-driven selection decisions during hiring and promotion processes. To measure performance, the LSP-R can be supplemented by SIGMARadius, a 360-degree assessment that asks managers, peers, and direct reports to provide a holistic perspective on how an individual performs on each of the 50 leadership competencies. See the table below for a comparison of assessment scope and use cases.

Table comparing LPI vs. LSP-R assessment use cases. The LSP-R covers all applications the LPI does, in addition to selection and hiring.

Figure 4. Comparison of assessment scope and use cases, LPI vs. LSP-R.

Using Assessments for Leadership Development

To learn more about how assessments can be leveraged for leadership development, watch SIGMA’s webinar, Talent Assessments for Leadership Development: Data-Driven Strategies to Grow Exceptional Leaders. The session covers why psychometric tools work for leadership development and how to use them to build self-awareness, leverage strengths, create personalized plans, and support organization-wide growth.

Start the Conversation

About the Author

Helen Schroeder

Marketing Project Manager

Helen assists in new product development and manages go-to-market strategies. She also creates and manages content for SIGMA’s webpages, blogs, and client resources. Helen holds an HBA from Ivey Business School and an Honors Specialization in Psychology from Western University.